SMT MOMINA W/O LATE ABDUL HAMEED vs MOHAMMAD AHMAD S/O BAHAR HUSAIN — 97/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPMO010022842026

Filing Number

231/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

97/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT MOMINA W/O LATE ABDUL HAMEED

    Adv. URMAN ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD AHMAD S/O BAHAR HUSAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed Smt. Momina's civil appeal (Case 97/2026) against Mohammad Ahmad on 09-05-2026 because the petitioner sought withdrawal of the appeal after an out-of-court settlement was reached. The respondent had agreed to return 161 square yards of property in exchange for the petitioner's 120 square yard house, resolving the dispute. The dismissal was ordered under Section 5 of the Limitation Act as the petitioner chose not to pursue the matter further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  4. 08-May-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Smt. Momina's civil appeal (Case 97/2026) against Mohammad Ahmad on 09-05-2026 because the petitioner sought withdrawal of the appeal after an out-of-court settlement was reached. The respondent had agreed to return 161 square yards of property in exchange for the petitioner's 120 square yard house, resolving the dispute. The dismissal was ordered under Section 5 of the Limitation Act as the petitioner chose not to pursue the matter further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case