MOHD SHAMSHUDDIN S/O SYRUN vs UP State — 532/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 333,115(2),74,352,351(2),76,309(6). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPMO010016362026

Filing Number

1471/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

532/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 333,115(2),74,352,351(2),76,309(6)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD SHAMSHUDDIN S/O SYRUN

    Adv. MUQEEMUR REHMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UP State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the second interim bail petition of Mohammad Shamsuddin (approximately 25 years old) in criminal case No. 312/2024 under sections 333, 115(2), 74, 352, 351(2), 76, and 309(6) IPC at Pakbada police station, Murabad district. The court found that the FIR was based on insufficient evidence, with no independent witnesses or medical corroboration of the alleged incident, and determined that the petitioner's prior bail plea was already dismissed on merit; therefore, no substantial change in circumstances warranted granting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the second interim bail petition of Mohammad Shamsuddin (approximately 25 years old) in criminal case No. 312/2024 under sections 333, 115(2), 74, 352, 351(2), 76, and 309(6) IPC at Pakbada police station, Murabad district. The court found that the FIR was based on insufficient evidence, with no independent witnesses or medical corroboration of the alleged incident, and determined that the petitioner's prior bail plea was already dismissed on merit; therefore, no substantial change in circumstances warranted granting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case