U.P. Avas Vikas Parisad vs vikram singh s/o jairam singh — 44/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 06th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases.(Old)
CNR: UPMO010005672017
Filing Number
85/2017
Filing Date
19-01-2017
Registration No
44/2017
Registration Date
19-01-2017
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
U.P. Avas Vikas Parisad
Adv. Shyam Kumar Saxena
Respondent(s)
vikram singh s/o jairam singh
Brij lal S/o jairam singh
Surendra Singh S/o Jairam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Moradabad
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District Judge of Moradabad dismissed Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 44/2017 (Uttar Pradesh Housing Development Board vs. Vikram Singh) due to the petitioner's non-appearance and absence of legal representation on the date of hearing (06.03.2026). The court found that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case, having failed to comply with court orders and providing no adjournment request, making dismissal warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional District Judge of Moradabad dismissed Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 44/2017 (Uttar Pradesh Housing Development Board vs. Vikram Singh) due to the petitioner's non-appearance and absence of legal representation on the date of hearing (06.03.2026). The court found that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case, having failed to comply with court orders and providing no adjournment request, making dismissal warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts