UP State vs Satya Pal singh Advocate - DILDAR HUSAIN UP — 400040/2010
Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
Special Trial(Old)
CNR: UPMO010002452010
Filing Number
400040/2010
Filing Date
06-02-2010
Registration No
400040/2010
Registration Date
06-02-2010
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 4/Special Judge MP-MLA/Special Judge of U.P. E.C. Special Provision Act 1981 Moradabad
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UP State
Adv. A.D.G.C.Crl.
Respondent(s)
Satya Pal singh Advocate - DILDAR HUSAIN UP
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No. 4/Special Judge MP-MLA/Special Judge of U.P. E.C. Special Provision Act 1981 Moradabad
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted accused Satyapal Singh of charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including lack of eyewitness testimony to the alleged theft, inconsistent witness statements, delayed FIR registration, and failure to examine relevant officials or establish the accused's involvement in the alleged unauthorized electricity usage at a mobile tower. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted accused Satyapal Singh of charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including lack of eyewitness testimony to the alleged theft, inconsistent witness statements, delayed FIR registration, and failure to examine relevant officials or establish the accused's involvement in the alleged unauthorized electricity usage at a mobile tower. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts