RAJU PANVAR S/O PAWAN PANWAR OTHERS vs STATE OF UP — 26/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,406,506 3/4. Disposed: Uncontested--ACCEPTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPME180004972026

Filing Number

461/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Sardhana

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Sardhana

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACCEPTED

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,406,506 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU PANVAR S/O PAWAN PANWAR OTHERS

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR PANWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate, Sadhna (Meerut) granted bail to three accused persons in a dowry harassment and criminal intimidation case under IPC Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court accepted the bail petition following the High Court of Allahabad's guidelines in Bachchi Devi v. U.P. 2025(3) Crimes 322, permitting accused to furnish personal bonds without insisting on regular bail applications when chargesheet is filed without arrest and the accused cooperated during investigation. The accused were directed to furnish a bond of ₹25,000 each with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sardhana

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate, Sadhna (Meerut) granted bail to three accused persons in a dowry harassment and criminal intimidation case under IPC Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court accepted the bail petition following the High Court of Allahabad's guidelines in Bachchi Devi v. U.P. 2025(3) Crimes 322, permitting accused to furnish personal bonds without insisting on regular bail applications when chargesheet is filed without arrest and the accused cooperated during investigation. The accused were directed to furnish a bond of ₹25,000 each with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case