SANJEEV S/O JAGDISH vs STATE OF UP — 25/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 131,115(2),351(2),352. Disposed: Uncontested--ACCEPTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPME180004962026

Filing Number

460/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Sardhana

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Sardhana

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACCEPTED

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 131,115(2),351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV S/O JAGDISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sadhana (Meerut) Magistrate Court accepted the bail plea of accused Sanjay against charges under IPC Sections 131, 115(2), 351(2), and 352, allowing him to furnish a personal bond of ₹25,000 without requiring immediate arrest or regular bail application, following the High Court of Allahabad's guidelines in Bachhi Devi case for cases where the charge-sheet was filed without arrest and the accused cooperated during investigation. The accused was directed to execute the bond with an undertaking to actively participate in future court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sardhana

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sadhana (Meerut) Magistrate Court accepted the bail plea of accused Sanjay against charges under IPC Sections 131, 115(2), 351(2), and 352, allowing him to furnish a personal bond of ₹25,000 without requiring immediate arrest or regular bail application, following the High Court of Allahabad's guidelines in Bachhi Devi case for cases where the charge-sheet was filed without arrest and the accused cooperated during investigation. The accused was directed to execute the bond with an undertaking to actively participate in future court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case