SMT NITISHA BANSAL vs SMT MANJU BANSAL OTHERS — 14/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPME120002572026

Filing Number

212/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Mawana

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT NITISHA BANSAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT MANJU BANSAL OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Mawana (Meerut, UP) converted a petition filed under Section 173(4) BNSS into a regular complaint case. The petitioner (widow) alleged that after her husband's death in 2018, his relatives fraudulently sold his parking property to a third party in 2025, depriving her and her minor children of their inheritance rights. The court found that the dispute primarily concerns property ownership, succession rights, and sale deed validity, which require evidence examination better suited for complaint proceedings rather than immediate police investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Mawana (Meerut, UP) converted a petition filed under Section 173(4) BNSS into a regular complaint case. The petitioner (widow) alleged that after her husband's death in 2018, his relatives fraudulently sold his parking property to a third party in 2025, depriving her and her minor children of their inheritance rights. The court found that the dispute primarily concerns property ownership, succession rights, and sale deed validity, which require evidence examination better suited for complaint proceedings rather than immediate police investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case