STATE OF U.P. vs bunty etc — 64/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506 3/4 dp. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.
CRI. CASE (old) - Cri. Case
CNR: UPME120002452020
Filing Number
190/2020
Filing Date
19-08-2020
Registration No
64/2020
Registration Date
19-08-2020
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Mawana
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF U.P.
Adv. ad
Respondent(s)
bunty etc
rahul
vipin
rajoo
nirbhay
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana
Order
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Order |
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | Order |
| 13-02-2026 | Order |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Mawana (Meerut), Uttar Pradesh acquitted all five accused persons—Rahul Kumar, Vipin Kumar, Hariom Urf Banti, Nirbhay Singh, and Smt. Rajo—of charges under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution's evidence contradictory and insufficient to prove the allegations of dowry demand, physical assault, and harassment beyond reasonable doubt, with the two key prosecution witnesses providing inconsistent testimonies that undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Mawana (Meerut), Uttar Pradesh acquitted all five accused persons—Rahul Kumar, Vipin Kumar, Hariom Urf Banti, Nirbhay Singh, and Smt. Rajo—of charges under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution's evidence contradictory and insufficient to prove the allegations of dowry demand, physical assault, and harassment beyond reasonable doubt, with the two key prosecution witnesses providing inconsistent testimonies that undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts