VIPIN TYAGI vs IBRAHIM OTHERS — 11/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPME120002232026

Filing Number

187/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Mawana

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIPIN TYAGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IBRAHIM OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Mawana (Meerut) rejected Vipin Tyagi's petition under Section 173(4) BNSS 2023 seeking FIR registration for alleged land fraud. The court found the dispute to be civil in nature arising from a property transaction agreement, not a criminal matter, and determined that adequate civil remedies (suit for specific performance or recovery of earnest money) are available to the petitioner without requiring police intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Mawana (Meerut) rejected Vipin Tyagi's petition under Section 173(4) BNSS 2023 seeking FIR registration for alleged land fraud. The court found the dispute to be civil in nature arising from a property transaction agreement, not a criminal matter, and determined that adequate civil remedies (suit for specific performance or recovery of earnest money) are available to the petitioner without requiring police intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case