STATE OF U.P. vs rohit — 64/2021
Case under U.p. Excise Act, 1910 Section 60. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CRI. CASE (old) - Cri. Case
CNR: UPME120001382021
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
124/2021
Filing Date
22-02-2021
Registration No
64/2021
Registration Date
22-02-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Mawana
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF U.P.
Adv. ad
Respondent(s)
rohit
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Div. Mawana
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 24-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 07-10-2025 | Evidence |
| 26-08-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary Case 1 (Civil Suit 64/21 - Futteh Singh v. Praveen Kumar): The case was dismissed due to non-appearance of both parties and lack of interest in pursuing the suit. The court found repeated absence despite adequate opportunities given and invoked Order 9 Rule 3 of CPC to dismiss the petition. Case 2 (Miscellaneous Appeal 221/2009 - Ajay Kakran v. Sushma): The appeal was dismissed due to the respondent's repeated non-appearance and lack of diligence despite receiving sufficient notice and final opportunity on 01.01.2020. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case 1 (Civil Suit 64/21 - Futteh Singh v. Praveen Kumar): The case was dismissed due to non-appearance of both parties and lack of interest in pursuing the suit. The court found repeated absence despite adequate opportunities given and invoked Order 9 Rule 3 of CPC to dismiss the petition. Case 2 (Miscellaneous Appeal 221/2009 - Ajay Kakran v. Sushma): The appeal was dismissed due to the respondent's repeated non-appearance and lack of diligence despite receiving sufficient notice and final opportunity on 01.01.2020. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts