Hind Pal Singh vs STATE OF UP — 1127/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,193,120B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPME010032042026

Filing Number

2910/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1127/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

72-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No.20

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,193,120B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hind Pal Singh

    Adv. Satish Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Meerut District Court granted anticipatory bail to Grindpal Singh in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 420, 120B, and 193 (cheating, criminal conspiracy, and giving false evidence). The court found that Singh, merely being the registered owner of the vehicle involved in a motor accident that resulted in a death, does not automatically establish criminal liability without evidence of his knowledge, consent, or involvement. Since Singh cooperated during investigation, was not arrested, and has no criminal history, the court accepted his bail petition on the condition of furnishing a personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No.20

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No.20

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Meerut District Court granted anticipatory bail to Grindpal Singh in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 420, 120B, and 193 (cheating, criminal conspiracy, and giving false evidence). The court found that Singh, merely being the registered owner of the vehicle involved in a motor accident that resulted in a death, does not automatically establish criminal liability without evidence of his knowledge, consent, or involvement. Since Singh cooperated during investigation, was not arrested, and has no criminal history, the court accepted his bail petition on the condition of furnishing a personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case