Drigpal and one other vs Madanpal and two others — 24/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd April 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPMB010009672025
Filing Number
50/2025
Filing Date
21-May-2025
Registration No
24/2025
Registration Date
21-May-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Drigpal and one other
Adv. Mr. Manish Shanker Amisht
-
2.Mahendra Pal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Madanpal and two others
-
2.Mahipat
-
3.Ramprakash
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The District Court of Mahoba allowed a petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning the delay in filing the appeal against the Civil Judge's order dated 15.01.2025, and accepted the appeal for consideration on its merits. The court found the delay was not intentional and granted the petitioner relief, directing further proceedings with the next hearing scheduled for 30.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
21-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2025
The District Court of Mahoba allowed a petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning the delay in filing the appeal against the Civil Judge's order dated 15.01.2025, and accepted the appeal for consideration on its merits. The court found the delay was not intentional and granted the petitioner relief, directing further proceedings with the next hearing scheduled for 30.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts