Shishupal Singh S/O Shivraj Singh vs STATE OF U.P. — 130/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPLL010055462025
Filing Number
5340/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
130/2025
Registration Date
22-Dec-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
KOTWALI LALITPUR
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shishupal Singh S/O Shivraj Singh
Adv. Vivek Kumar Srivastava
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P.
-
2.Pankaj Shrivas S/O / Rajendra Shrivas
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision filed by Shisupal Singh and upheld the lower court's order summoning him for trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bounce case). The court found that the magistrate properly evaluated the evidence—including the bounced cheque for ₹9,70,000, the statutory notice, and delivery proof—and established a prima facie case warranting trial. The court clarified that evidence evaluation at the summons stage differs from final adjudication, requiring only reasonable grounds to suspect an offense, not conclusive proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Order/Disposal
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 130/2025
Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision filed by Shisupal Singh and upheld the lower court's order summoning him for trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bounce case). The court found that the magistrate properly evaluated the evidence—including the bounced cheque for ₹9,70,000, the statutory notice, and delivery proof—and established a prima facie case warranting trial. The court clarified that evidence evaluation at the summons stage differs from final adjudication, requiring only reasonable grounds to suspect an offense, not conclusive proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts