Brajendra Singh Yadav s/o Shankar Singh vs STATE OF U.P. — 717/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPLL010052972025

Case disposed

Filing Number

5099/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

717/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

Police Station

KOTWALI LALITPUR

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Brajendra Singh Yadav s/o Shankar Singh

Adv. Anil Kumar Yadav

Respondent(s)

STATE OF U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Order/Disposal

16-02-2026

Hearing

03-02-2026

Hearing

16-01-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
order

Case Summary The Sessions Court at Lalitpur accepted the applicant Brijendra Singh Yadav's plea to condone the delay of 1 year, 3 months, and 13 days in filing a revision petition against an order dated 28.08.2024. The court found the delay justified, as the applicant was unaware of the order and only received the court's certified copy on 07.11.2025 after applying on 16.09.2025, demonstrating no deliberate negligence. Following Supreme Court precedents emphasizing substantial justice over technical limitations, the court allowed the revision petition to proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court at Lalitpur accepted the applicant Brijendra Singh Yadav's plea to condone the delay of 1 year, 3 months, and 13 days in filing a revision petition against an order dated 28.08.2024. The court found the delay justified, as the applicant was unaware of the order and only received the court's certified copy on 07.11.2025 after applying on 16.09.2025, demonstrating no deliberate negligence. Following Supreme Court precedents emphasizing substantial justice over technical limitations, the court allowed the revision petition to proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case