Brajendra Singh Yadav s/o Shankar Singh vs STATE OF U.P. — 717/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPLL010052972025

Filing Number

5099/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

717/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

KOTWALI LALITPUR

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Brajendra Singh Yadav s/o Shankar Singh

    Adv. Anil Kumar Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Court at Lalitpur accepted the applicant Brijendra Singh Yadav's plea to condone the delay of 1 year, 3 months, and 13 days in filing a revision petition against an order dated 28.08.2024. The court found the delay justified, as the applicant was unaware of the order and only received the court's certified copy on 07.11.2025 after applying on 16.09.2025, demonstrating no deliberate negligence. Following Supreme Court precedents emphasizing substantial justice over technical limitations, the court allowed the revision petition to proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 717/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court at Lalitpur accepted the applicant Brijendra Singh Yadav's plea to condone the delay of 1 year, 3 months, and 13 days in filing a revision petition against an order dated 28.08.2024. The court found the delay justified, as the applicant was unaware of the order and only received the court's certified copy on 07.11.2025 after applying on 16.09.2025, demonstrating no deliberate negligence. Following Supreme Court precedents emphasizing substantial justice over technical limitations, the court allowed the revision petition to proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case