Kuldeep Dixit S/O Lal Jeevan Dixit vs STATE OF U.P. — 101/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPLL010046752025
Filing Number
4501/2025
Filing Date
15-Nov-2025
Registration No
101/2025
Registration Date
15-Nov-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
KOTWALI LALITPUR
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kuldeep Dixit S/O Lal Jeevan Dixit
Adv. Kamlesh Kumar Richhariya
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P.
-
2.Nitin Kumar Jain S/O Dhnya Kumar Jain
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court dismissed Kuldeep Dixit's criminal revision petition challenging the Magistrate's order summoning him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for alleged dishonored cheque. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the complainant's documents (cheque, bank return memo, notice) to proceed with trial, and held that at the summons stage, the court need not conduct a detailed merit-based evaluation but only verify if cognizable offense appears probable based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Order/Disposal
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 101/2025
Summary The Sessions Court dismissed Kuldeep Dixit's criminal revision petition challenging the Magistrate's order summoning him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for alleged dishonored cheque. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the complainant's documents (cheque, bank return memo, notice) to proceed with trial, and held that at the summons stage, the court need not conduct a detailed merit-based evaluation but only verify if cognizable offense appears probable based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts