Kamal Singh S/o Taran Lodhi vs Omprakash S/o Mohan and 3 others — 159/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6),310(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 11th March 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPLL010010942025
Filing Number
1051/2025
Filing Date
25-Mar-2025
Registration No
159/2025
Registration Date
25-Mar-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
BANPUR
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kamal Singh S/o Taran Lodhi
Adv. Bharat Singh Rajpoot
Respondent(s)
-
1.Omprakash S/o Mohan and 3 others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court, Lalitpur, dismissed the petition filed by Kamal Singh against Om Prakash in Misc. Case No. 159/2025 dated 11.03.2026. The court found the respondent repeatedly absent despite multiple summons and without legal representation or any statement under Section 223 BNS, and no prima facie evidence supported the petitioner's claims, making dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
27-Jan-2026
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
18-Dec-2025
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
06-Dec-2025
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
14-Oct-2025
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
26-Sep-2025
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
14-Aug-2025
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
08-Jul-2025
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
28-May-2025
Statement u/s 200
Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)
-
23-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 159/2025
Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court, Lalitpur, dismissed the petition filed by Kamal Singh against Om Prakash in Misc. Case No. 159/2025 dated 11.03.2026. The court found the respondent repeatedly absent despite multiple summons and without legal representation or any statement under Section 223 BNS, and no prima facie evidence supported the petitioner's claims, making dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts