Golu Yadav urf Sanjay vs STATE OF U.P. — 288/2026

Case under Gangsters Act Section 2/3. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPLL010009872026

Filing Number

953/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

288/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

397

Police Station

KOTWALI LALITPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Gangsters Act Section 2/3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Golu Yadav urf Sanjay

    Adv. Lokesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail OrdersView PDF

    Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (Gangster Act), Lalitpur granted bail to Golu Yadav (alias Sanjay) on March 17, 2026, in a case under Sections 2/3 of the Gangster Act, despite the prosecution's argument that he had a criminal history and posed flight risk. The court accepted the bail application after finding that the applicant's absence on the previous hearing date (05.02.2026) was due to personal circumstances and the resulting non-bailable warrant was justified. The court released him on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of equal amount, on conditions of regular court appearance and cooperation in judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 288/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (Gangster Act), Lalitpur granted bail to Golu Yadav (alias Sanjay) on March 17, 2026, in a case under Sections 2/3 of the Gangster Act, despite the prosecution's argument that he had a criminal history and posed flight risk. The court accepted the bail application after finding that the applicant's absence on the previous hearing date (05.02.2026) was due to personal circumstances and the resulting non-bailable warrant was justified. The court released him on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of equal amount, on conditions of regular court appearance and cooperation in judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case