Harishanker vs STATE OF U.P. — 228/2026

Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2/3. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPLL010007712026

Filing Number

742/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

676

Police Station

KOTWALI LALITPUR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 2/3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harishanker

    Adv. Vaibhav Kumar Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The Additional District and Sessions Court (Gangster Act), Lalitpur granted bail to Harishankr (age 51) on March 11, 2026, in a case under Section 2/3 of the Gangster Act. The applicant, who was previously on bail but failed to appear due to illness and health issues, was granted bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with conditions including mandatory court appearance and full cooperation in judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District and Sessions Court (Gangster Act), Lalitpur granted bail to Harishankr (age 51) on March 11, 2026, in a case under Section 2/3 of the Gangster Act. The applicant, who was previously on bail but failed to appear due to illness and health issues, was granted bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with conditions including mandatory court appearance and full cooperation in judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case