Bhupendra Singh S/O Veer Singh vs STATE OF U.P. — 7/2026
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPLL010003972026
Filing Number
13/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhupendra Singh S/O Veer Singh
Adv. Anand kumar Jain
Shayam Devi W/O Veer Singh
Respondent(s)
STATE OF U.P.
Medical Officer Community Health Centre
Chief Medical Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 20-01-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Court of Lalitpur accepted the applicants' petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the 11-day delay in filing an appeal (Civil Suit No. 450/2022) against the trial court's order dated 09.12.2025. The court held that the delay was excusable as the applicants could not obtain certified copies of the order promptly due to administrative reasons, and found no deliberate negligence or mala fides. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing substantial justice over technical considerations, the court permitted the appeal to proceed on merit rather than rejecting it on grounds of delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Court of Lalitpur accepted the applicants' petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the 11-day delay in filing an appeal (Civil Suit No. 450/2022) against the trial court's order dated 09.12.2025. The court held that the delay was excusable as the applicants could not obtain certified copies of the order promptly due to administrative reasons, and found no deliberate negligence or mala fides. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing substantial justice over technical considerations, the court permitted the appeal to proceed on merit rather than rejecting it on grounds of delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts