Ramsevak vs Parmanand others — 27/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2),311. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPLL010002802026

Filing Number

272/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

BANPUR

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2),311
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173 (4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramsevak

    Adv. Uttam Chand Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parmanand others

  2. 2.jagdish s/o parmanand

  3. 3.kalyan s/o murlidhar

  4. 4.nilesh s/o murlidhar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary The court accepted the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) CrPC and directed the police station to register an FIR against the accused for alleged robbery, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with weapons. The court found that the petitioner's complaint regarding a violent attack on his home by multiple individuals who assaulted him, looted jewelry and cash (dowry items), and threatened him with a knife was credible, supported by registered postal evidence, and warranted investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Order/Disposal

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Spl. Judge(U.P. Dacoity.A.A.)

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court accepted the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) CrPC and directed the police station to register an FIR against the accused for alleged robbery, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with weapons. The court found that the petitioner's complaint regarding a violent attack on his home by multiple individuals who assaulted him, looted jewelry and cash (dowry items), and threatened him with a knife was credible, supported by registered postal evidence, and warranted investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case