AYUSH YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. — 1832/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),351(3),281,140(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPLK010038852026

Filing Number

3400/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

1832/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 10-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

ITAUNJA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),351(3),281,140(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYUSH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is rejectedView PDF

    Case Summary: Ayush Yadav v. State of U.P. (1832/2026) The Sessions Court, Lucknow rejected Ayush Yadav's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(3), 281, and 140(1) for alleged involvement in a gang attack on February 23, 2026. The court found prima facie evidence linking the applicant to the incident based on witness statements identifying him as one of six individuals in an unnumbered Scorpio vehicle who allegedly rammed the victim's two-wheeler, assaulted him with rods and sticks, and abducted him. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's alleged membership in an organized gang, and the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1832/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ayush Yadav v. State of U.P. (1832/2026) The Sessions Court, Lucknow rejected Ayush Yadav's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(3), 281, and 140(1) for alleged involvement in a gang attack on February 23, 2026. The court found prima facie evidence linking the applicant to the incident based on witness statements identifying him as one of six individuals in an unnumbered Scorpio vehicle who allegedly rammed the victim's two-wheeler, assaulted him with rods and sticks, and abducted him. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's alleged membership in an organized gang, and the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case