State Government of Uttar Pradesh vs Yogendra Jaysawal — 120/2025
Case under Forest Conservation Act Section 4/10. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 16th March 2026.
Warrant or Summons Criminal Case
CNR: UPKU100000482025
Filing Number
48/2025
Filing Date
13-Jan-2025
Registration No
120/2025
Registration Date
13-Jan-2025
Court
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate , Kasia
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yogendra Jaysawal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh convicted Yogendra Jaysawal under Section 4/10 of the Forest Conservation Act based on his voluntary confession before the court. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with five days simple imprisonment as the alternate punishment in case of non-payment of the fine, considering his poor financial condition and status as the sole earner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
-
24-Nov-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
-
01-Aug-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
-
23-May-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kasia Kushinagar
-
10-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 120/2025
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh convicted Yogendra Jaysawal under Section 4/10 of the Forest Conservation Act based on his voluntary confession before the court. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with five days simple imprisonment as the alternate punishment in case of non-payment of the fine, considering his poor financial condition and status as the sole earner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts