State vs Ayyaz Advocate - NA — 1356/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,307,308,323,326,452,504,506. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPKJ010072842023
Filing Number
6911/2023
Filing Date
18-12-2023
Registration No
1356/2023
Registration Date
18-12-2023
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
907
Police Station
GURSAHAIGANJ
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
Ayyaz Advocate - NA
Daveer
Adv. NA
Kadeer
Rashid alias Bablu
Adv. NA
Sajid
Adv. NA
Laeek
Adv. NA
Lalla
Mushtak
Khalid
Kasim
Parvej
Guddu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 11-11-2025 | Hearing |
| 06-10-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court, Kannauj closed Sessions Case No. 1356 of 2023 after the High Court quashed all criminal proceedings in Crime No. 907 of 2017 (involving 12 accused charged under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 308, 323, 326, 452, 504, 506) following an amicable settlement between the informant and accused parties. The court clarified that the High Court's quashing order dated 15.04.2025 (modified on 19.01.2026) covered all offences including those initially omitted, and consequently closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court, Kannauj closed Sessions Case No. 1356 of 2023 after the High Court quashed all criminal proceedings in Crime No. 907 of 2017 (involving 12 accused charged under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 308, 323, 326, 452, 504, 506) following an amicable settlement between the informant and accused parties. The court clarified that the High Court's quashing order dated 15.04.2025 (modified on 19.01.2026) covered all offences including those initially omitted, and consequently closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts