State vs Mahendra — 1061/2023
Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPKJ010055132023
e-Filing Number
06-10-2023
Filing Number
5218/2023
Filing Date
06-Oct-2023
Registration No
1061/2023
Registration Date
19-Oct-2023
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
463
Police Station
ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahendra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Judgement PronouncedView PDF
The court acquitted defendant Mahendra Singh under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, after finding the offense compoundable. The acquittal was granted because the defendant paid all outstanding electricity dues to the power distribution department and the Executive Engineer raised no objection to case closure. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that electricity theft offenses are compoundable in nature when full dues are paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
16-Feb-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
27-Jan-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
14-Jan-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
21-Nov-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
17-Sep-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj V
-
15-Jul-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj V
-
14-May-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
18-Mar-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
08-Jan-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
05-Oct-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
09-Aug-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
30-May-2024
Hearing
Adj III
-
01-Apr-2024
Hearing
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
19-Dec-2023
Hearing
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
31-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1061/2023
The court acquitted defendant Mahendra Singh under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, after finding the offense compoundable. The acquittal was granted because the defendant paid all outstanding electricity dues to the power distribution department and the Executive Engineer raised no objection to case closure. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that electricity theft offenses are compoundable in nature when full dues are paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts