Amit kumar Katiyar vs Maya Devi Education Promotion Committee, Manager Shri Suresh Chandra — 54/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPKJ010051632025
Filing Number
394/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Amit kumar Katiyar
Adv. Ram Ji Srivastav
-
2.Sumit Katiyar
-
3.Shubham Kumar Katiyar
-
4.Manju Katiyar
-
5.Tanishq Katiyar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Maya Devi Education Promotion Committee, Manager Shri Suresh Chandra
-
2.Suresh Chandra
-
3.Umesh Chandra Trivedi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Summary The District Judge of Kannauj dismissed Miscellaneous Civil Appeal 54/2025 filed by Amit Kumar Katiyar against Maya Devi as infructuous (without utility), finding that the original order dated 09.12.2025 against which the appeal was filed no longer existed and had ceased to have effect. Since the subject matter of the appeal had become ineffective, the court found it futile to consider the merits of the case and accordingly dismissed the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2025
Summary The District Judge of Kannauj dismissed Miscellaneous Civil Appeal 54/2025 filed by Amit Kumar Katiyar against Maya Devi as infructuous (without utility), finding that the original order dated 09.12.2025 against which the appeal was filed no longer existed and had ceased to have effect. Since the subject matter of the appeal had become ineffective, the court found it futile to consider the merits of the case and accordingly dismissed the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts