Suneeta vs State — 127/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPKJ010039562025

Filing Number

3704/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

127/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

GURSAHAIGANJ

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suneeta

    Adv. vinesh kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

  2. 2.Mansingh

  3. 3.Madanlal

  4. 4.Ajay

  5. 5.Vijay

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement PronouncedView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge of Kannauj accepted the criminal revision petition filed by Sunita against the order dated 07.07.2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed her complaint. The court found that the complainant's non-appearance was due to poverty and illness rather than intentional misconduct, and that the lower court's order lacked sufficient justification. Consequently, the court set aside the dismissal order and directed the lower court to reinstate and reconsider the complaint (FIR No. 245/20 under IPC Sections 323, 504, 308, etc.) on merits by 17.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge of Kannauj accepted the criminal revision petition filed by Sunita against the order dated 07.07.2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed her complaint. The court found that the complainant's non-appearance was due to poverty and illness rather than intentional misconduct, and that the lower court's order lacked sufficient justification. Consequently, the court set aside the dismissal order and directed the lower court to reinstate and reconsider the complaint (FIR No. 245/20 under IPC Sections 323, 504, 308, etc.) on merits by 17.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case