State vs Vivek Kumar Advocate - Sanjeev Shukla (SPP) — 833/2024
Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPKJ010034742024
e-Filing Number
22-07-2024
Filing Number
3195/2024
Filing Date
20-07-2024
Registration No
833/2024
Registration Date
20-07-2024
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
900
Police Station
ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Respondent(s)
Vivek Kumar Advocate - Sanjeev Shukla (SPP)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
Appearance of accused
Appearance of accused
Appearance of accused
Appearance of accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Appearance of accused | |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance of accused | |
| 06-03-2026 | Appearance of accused | |
| 05-03-2026 | Appearance of accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Vivek Kumar of electricity theft charges under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act 2003. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the specific elements required for conviction, including the quantum of electricity stolen and financial benefit gained by the accused. Notably, the accused had already paid all outstanding electricity dues (₹1,30,211), penalties (₹26,000), and charges (₹2,852) to the electricity department, and the department confirmed no objection to closing the criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Vivek Kumar of electricity theft charges under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act 2003. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the specific elements required for conviction, including the quantum of electricity stolen and financial benefit gained by the accused. Notably, the accused had already paid all outstanding electricity dues (₹1,30,211), penalties (₹26,000), and charges (₹2,852) to the electricity department, and the department confirmed no objection to closing the criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts