State vs Dharmpal — 712/2024

Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: UPKJ010031312024

e-Filing Number

01-07-2024

Filing Number

2880/2024

Filing Date

01-Jul-2024

Registration No

712/2024

Registration Date

03-Jul-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

172

Police Station

ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dharmpal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judgement PronouncedView PDF

    Summary: The court acquitted accused Dharampal under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003, finding the electricity theft offense to be "compoundable" (capable of settlement). The decision was based on the fact that Dharampal had paid all outstanding electricity dues to the department, and the supervising engineer confirmed no objection to case closure. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that offenses under Section 135 (electricity theft involving meter damage) are compoundable in nature, and therefore Section 152 provisions apply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    ADJ I

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    ADJ I

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    ADJ I

  7. 14-Jan-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    ADJ I

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  10. 08-Aug-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Adj V

  11. 10-Jun-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Adj III

  12. 15-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Adj III

  13. 11-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Adj III

  14. 20-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Adj III

  15. 03-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 01-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 712/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted accused Dharampal under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003, finding the electricity theft offense to be "compoundable" (capable of settlement). The decision was based on the fact that Dharampal had paid all outstanding electricity dues to the department, and the supervising engineer confirmed no objection to case closure. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that offenses under Section 135 (electricity theft involving meter damage) are compoundable in nature, and therefore Section 152 provisions apply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case