State vs Raaju PAl @ Other — 300042/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

SST (SC/ST) Act - Special Trail (SC/ST) Act

CNR: UPKJ010020332019

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

300042/2019

Filing Date

16-04-2019

Registration No

300042/2019

Registration Date

16-04-2019

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Special Judge SC/St Act

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

260

Police Station

SAURIKH

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,504,506,
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)(x)

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. ADGC

Respondent(s)

Raaju PAl @ Other

Govind Verma

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Special Judge SC/St Act

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

For Judgment

11-03-2026

For Judgment

10-03-2026

For Judgment

24-02-2026

For Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgement

Court Judgment Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj acquitted accused Rajupal and Govind Verma of charges under IPC Sections 323/34, 504, and 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(x). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged assault and casteist abuses beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and contradictory. The victim's account in court differed significantly from his initial police statement, undermining the credibility of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kannauj acquitted accused Rajupal and Govind Verma of charges under IPC Sections 323/34, 504, and 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(x). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged assault and casteist abuses beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and contradictory. The victim's account in court differed significantly from his initial police statement, undermining the credibility of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case