State vs satyaram — 412/2018

Case under Electricity(temporary)control Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Special Trail (e.a.) - Special Trail(Electricity Act)

CNR: UPKJ010019162018

Filing Number

412/2018

Filing Date

19-Apr-2018

Registration No

412/2018

Registration Date

19-Apr-2018

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

199

Police Station

CHHIBRAMAU

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Electricity(temporary)control Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.satyaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judgement PronouncedView PDF

    The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Satyaram Baathm of electricity theft charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding dues to the electricity department. The court invoked Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003 to compound the offense, relying on Supreme Court precedent that electricity theft offenses are compoundable in nature when dues are settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For orders

    ADJ I

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    For orders

    ADJ I

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    For orders

    ADJ I

  7. 13-Dec-2025

    For orders

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    For orders

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  10. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  11. 22-May-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  12. 24-Mar-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  13. 23-Dec-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  14. 21-Sep-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  15. 01-Jul-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  16. 04-May-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  17. 11-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  18. 16-Jan-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  19. 30-Nov-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  20. 18-Oct-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  21. 30-Aug-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  22. 25-Jul-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  23. 07-Jun-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  24. 28-Apr-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  25. 17-Feb-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  26. 15-Dec-2022

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ I

  27. 21-Sep-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  28. 27-Jun-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  29. 05-Apr-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  30. 14-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  31. 21-Oct-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  32. 10-Aug-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  33. 03-Jul-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  34. 12-Apr-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Additional Special Judge(POCSO and Rape Cases)

  35. 24-Feb-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Additional Special Judge(POCSO and Rape Cases)

  36. 02-Jan-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Additional Special Judge(POCSO and Rape Cases)

  37. 30-Oct-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  38. 01-Oct-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  39. 29-Aug-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  40. 24-Jul-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  41. 22-Jun-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  42. 18-May-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  43. 25-Feb-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  44. 26-Nov-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  45. 14-Oct-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  46. 05-Sep-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  47. 18-Jul-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  48. 08-May-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  49. 27-Mar-2019

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ IV

  50. 31-Jan-2019

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ IV

  51. 11-Dec-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    ADJ IV

  52. 30-Oct-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    ADJ IV

  53. 05-Sep-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    ADJ IV

  54. 20-Jul-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    Adj III

  55. 11-Jun-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    Adj III

  56. 09-Jun-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 19-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 412/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Satyaram Baathm of electricity theft charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding dues to the electricity department. The court invoked Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003 to compound the offense, relying on Supreme Court precedent that electricity theft offenses are compoundable in nature when dues are settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case