State vs satyaram — 412/2018
Case under Electricity(temporary)control Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Special Trail (e.a.) - Special Trail(Electricity Act)
CNR: UPKJ010019162018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
412/2018
Filing Date
19-04-2018
Registration No
412/2018
Registration Date
19-04-2018
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
CHHIBRAMAU
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Respondent(s)
satyaram
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
For orders
For orders
For orders
For orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | For orders | |
| 06-03-2026 | For orders | |
| 28-02-2026 | For orders | |
| 13-12-2025 | For orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Satyaram Baathm of electricity theft charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding dues to the electricity department. The court invoked Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003 to compound the offense, relying on Supreme Court precedent that electricity theft offenses are compoundable in nature when dues are settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Satyaram Baathm of electricity theft charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding dues to the electricity department. The court invoked Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003 to compound the offense, relying on Supreme Court precedent that electricity theft offenses are compoundable in nature when dues are settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts