State vs shiv narayan — 350/2018

Case under Electricity(temporary)control Act Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Special Trail (e.a.) - Special Trail(Electricity Act)

CNR: UPKJ010018422018

Filing Number

350/2018

Filing Date

19-Apr-2018

Registration No

350/2018

Registration Date

19-Apr-2018

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

779

Police Station

TIRWA

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Electricity(temporary)control Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.shiv narayan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    Court Summary The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Shiv Narayan under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003 (unauthorized electricity connection), finding insufficient evidence to prove the electricity theft charge. The court held that while the prosecution witnesses testified about detecting illegal reconnection of a previously disconnected meter, critical evidence regarding the extent of theft and financial loss was absent, and the FIR was registered against the accused's deceased father, creating legal irregularity. The accused has already paid all outstanding electricity bills and settlement dues totaling approximately ₹56,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    For Judgment

    ADJ I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For Judgment

    ADJ I

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    For Judgment

    ADJ I

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    For Judgment

    ADJ I

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  12. 14-Aug-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj V

  13. 16-Jul-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj V

  14. 15-May-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj III

  15. 18-Apr-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj III

  16. 26-Mar-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj III

  17. 24-Feb-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj III

  18. 30-Jan-2025

    For Judgment

    Adj III

  19. 07-Jan-2025

    For final arguments

    Adj III

  20. 10-Dec-2024

    For final arguments

    Adj III

  21. 26-Nov-2024

    For final arguments

    Adj III

  22. 07-Nov-2024

    For final arguments

    Adj III

  23. 17-Oct-2024

    For final arguments

    Adj III

  24. 19-Sep-2024

    For examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C

    Adj III

  25. 20-Aug-2024

    For Evidence

    Adj III

  26. 31-Jul-2024

    For Evidence

    Adj III

  27. 04-Jun-2024

    For Evidence

    Adj III

  28. 30-Apr-2024

    For Evidence

    Adj III

  29. 18-Mar-2024

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  30. 18-Jan-2024

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  31. 05-Dec-2023

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  32. 17-Nov-2023

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  33. 19-Oct-2023

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  34. 20-Sep-2023

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  35. 02-Sep-2023

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  36. 03-Aug-2023

    For Evidence

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  37. 14-Jun-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  38. 20-Feb-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  39. 16-Dec-2022

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ I

  40. 22-Sep-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  41. 28-Jun-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  42. 06-Apr-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  43. 17-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  44. 25-Oct-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  45. 12-Aug-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  46. 06-Jul-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  47. 02-Jun-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  48. 02-Apr-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Additional Special Judge(POCSO and Rape Cases)

  49. 18-Feb-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Additional Special Judge(POCSO and Rape Cases)

  50. 17-Dec-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Additional Special Judge(POCSO and Rape Cases)

  51. 15-Dec-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Additional Special Judge(POCSO and Rape Cases)

  52. 20-Oct-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  53. 28-Sep-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  54. 27-Aug-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  55. 20-Jul-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  56. 24-Jun-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj III

  57. 20-May-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  58. 18-Apr-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.T.C.I

  59. 20-Jan-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  60. 06-Nov-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  61. 04-Sep-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj V

  62. 16-Jul-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  63. 17-Jun-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Adj F.t.c.ii

  64. 10-Apr-2019

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ IV

  65. 11-Feb-2019

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ IV

  66. 04-Jan-2019

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ IV

  67. 19-Nov-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    ADJ IV

  68. 26-Sep-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    ADJ IV

  69. 10-Aug-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    ADJ IV

  70. 05-Jul-2018

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    Adj III

  71. 29-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 19-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 350/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Shiv Narayan under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003 (unauthorized electricity connection), finding insufficient evidence to prove the electricity theft charge. The court held that while the prosecution witnesses testified about detecting illegal reconnection of a previously disconnected meter, critical evidence regarding the extent of theft and financial loss was absent, and the FIR was registered against the accused's deceased father, creating legal irregularity. The accused has already paid all outstanding electricity bills and settlement dues totaling approximately ₹56,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case