State vs shiv narayan — 350/2018
Case under Electricity(temporary)control Act Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th March 2026.
Special Trail (e.a.) - Special Trail(Electricity Act)
CNR: UPKJ010018422018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
350/2018
Filing Date
19-04-2018
Registration No
350/2018
Registration Date
19-04-2018
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
779
Police Station
TIRWA
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Respondent(s)
shiv narayan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
For Judgment
For Judgment
For Judgment
For Judgment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | For Judgment | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Judgment | |
| 20-02-2026 | For Judgment | |
| 22-12-2025 | For Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Shiv Narayan under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003 (unauthorized electricity connection), finding insufficient evidence to prove the electricity theft charge. The court held that while the prosecution witnesses testified about detecting illegal reconnection of a previously disconnected meter, critical evidence regarding the extent of theft and financial loss was absent, and the FIR was registered against the accused's deceased father, creating legal irregularity. The accused has already paid all outstanding electricity bills and settlement dues totaling approximately ₹56,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Special Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Shiv Narayan under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 2003 (unauthorized electricity connection), finding insufficient evidence to prove the electricity theft charge. The court held that while the prosecution witnesses testified about detecting illegal reconnection of a previously disconnected meter, critical evidence regarding the extent of theft and financial loss was absent, and the FIR was registered against the accused's deceased father, creating legal irregularity. The accused has already paid all outstanding electricity bills and settlement dues totaling approximately ₹56,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts