State vs Dharmendra Singh — 524/2024

Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 03rd April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: UPKJ010017582024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-03-2024

Filing Number

1642/2024

Filing Date

30-03-2024

Registration No

524/2024

Registration Date

08-04-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1019

Police Station

ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY ACT,2003 Section 138(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

State

Respondent(s)

Dharmendra Singh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

03-04-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

For Judgment

27-03-2026

Appearance of accused

09-03-2026

Appearance of accused

20-02-2026

Appearance of accused

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
Copy of Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Dharmendra Singh of charges under Section 138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the required elements of the offense, including the extent of electricity misuse and financial gain obtained, and no independent technical/mechanical examination report was submitted to substantiate the allegations. The accused had also paid all outstanding electricity dues and penalties, and the electricity department raised no objection to case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Kannauj acquitted Dharmendra Singh of charges under Section 138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the required elements of the offense, including the extent of electricity misuse and financial gain obtained, and no independent technical/mechanical examination report was submitted to substantiate the allegations. The accused had also paid all outstanding electricity dues and penalties, and the electricity department raised no objection to case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case