State vs Sunita — 481/2024
Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPKJ010016142024
e-Filing Number
22-03-2024
Filing Number
1501/2024
Filing Date
22-Mar-2024
Registration No
481/2024
Registration Date
05-Apr-2024
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1229
Police Station
ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunita
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Judgement PronouncedView PDF
The court acquitted the accused Sushita (wife of Satish Chandra) of charges under Section 138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act 2003 for illegal electricity reconnection and theft, after she paid all outstanding electricity bills to the department. The court found the offense to be compoundable in nature under Section 152 of the Electricity Act 2003 and exercised its discretion to condone the offense, thereby ordering her acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
07-Mar-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
19-Feb-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
05-Feb-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
09-Dec-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
19-Sep-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj V
-
18-Jul-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj V
-
17-May-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
19-Mar-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
06-Jan-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
15-Oct-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
13-Aug-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
07-Jun-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
07-Jun-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
22-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 481/2024
The court acquitted the accused Sushita (wife of Satish Chandra) of charges under Section 138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act 2003 for illegal electricity reconnection and theft, after she paid all outstanding electricity bills to the department. The court found the offense to be compoundable in nature under Section 152 of the Electricity Act 2003 and exercised its discretion to condone the offense, thereby ordering her acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts