State vs dalel — 125/2018
Case under Electricity(temporary)control Act Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 26th March 2026.
Special Trail (e.a.) - Special Trail(Electricity Act)
CNR: UPKJ010015232018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
125/2018
Filing Date
11-04-2018
Registration No
125/2018
Registration Date
11-04-2018
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1022
Police Station
KOTWALI KANNAUJ
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. ahsan jama ad
Respondent(s)
dalel
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
For orders
For orders
For orders
For orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | For orders | |
| 28-02-2026 | For orders | |
| 13-12-2025 | For orders | |
| 03-12-2025 | For orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Sessions Court (Electricity Matters), Kannauj acquitted defendant Daleel Singh of charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft. The court found that while Singh had reconnected a previously disconnected power meter without paying outstanding bills of ₹45,628, the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of electricity theft, including the quantum of electricity stolen and financial loss caused, as no independent technical evidence or meter report was presented. Additionally, the court noted that Singh had subsequently paid all outstanding dues and related settlement amounts, with the electricity department confirming no objection to case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Sessions Court (Electricity Matters), Kannauj acquitted defendant Daleel Singh of charges under Section 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft. The court found that while Singh had reconnected a previously disconnected power meter without paying outstanding bills of ₹45,628, the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of electricity theft, including the quantum of electricity stolen and financial loss caused, as no independent technical evidence or meter report was presented. Additionally, the court noted that Singh had subsequently paid all outstanding dues and related settlement amounts, with the electricity department confirming no objection to case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts