State (Vishal Kumar) vs Pramod Kumar — 677/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 03rd April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPKJ010014622022
Filing Number
1169/2022
Filing Date
12-Apr-2022
Registration No
677/2022
Registration Date
12-Apr-2022
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
SAURIKH
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State (Vishal Kumar)
Adv. Arun kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pramod Kumar
-
2.Devendra Kumar
-
3.Anoop Kumar
-
4.Akshay @ Ashu
-
5.Chetan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 677/2022 — State v. Pramod Kumar and Others Decision: The court acquitted all five accused (Pramod Kumar, Devendra Kumar, Anoop Kumar, Akshay alias Aashu, and Chetan) of charges under IPC Sections 395 (dacoity), 504 (insult), and 506 (criminal intimidation) filed by Vishal Kumar for an alleged incident on March 18, 2022. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The main witness (PW-1, the complainant Vishal Kumar) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating the accused neither robbed his gold chain/₹1,700 nor assaulted or abused him. The other two prosecution witnesses (PW-2 and PW-3) categorically denied witnessing any incident, contradicting the complainant's allegations. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2026
For Judgment
ADJ I
-
21-Jan-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
17-Jan-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
11-Dec-2025
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
11-Nov-2025
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
17-Oct-2025
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
02-Aug-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
21-Jun-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
11-Jun-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
28-Apr-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
19-Mar-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
30-Jan-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
29-Nov-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
16-Oct-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
03-Aug-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
01-Jul-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
10-May-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
02-Apr-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
20-Feb-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
09-Jan-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
16-Nov-2023
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
19-Oct-2023
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
05-Oct-2023
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
17-Aug-2023
Appearance of accused
Adj F.T.C.I
-
06-Jun-2023
Appearance of accused
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
06-Apr-2023
Appearance of accused
Adj II
-
13-Feb-2023
Appearance of accused
Adj II
-
14-Dec-2022
Appearance of accused
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
09-Nov-2022
Appearance of accused
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
06-Oct-2022
Appearance of accused
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
08-Aug-2022
Appearance of accused
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
13-Jul-2022
Hearing
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
07-Jun-2022
Hearing
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
26-May-2022
For orders
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
16-May-2022
Hearing
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
07-May-2022
Hearing
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
28-Apr-2022
Hearing
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
19-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 677/2022
Case Summary: 677/2022 — State v. Pramod Kumar and Others Decision: The court acquitted all five accused (Pramod Kumar, Devendra Kumar, Anoop Kumar, Akshay alias Aashu, and Chetan) of charges under IPC Sections 395 (dacoity), 504 (insult), and 506 (criminal intimidation) filed by Vishal Kumar for an alleged incident on March 18, 2022. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The main witness (PW-1, the complainant Vishal Kumar) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating the accused neither robbed his gold chain/₹1,700 nor assaulted or abused him. The other two prosecution witnesses (PW-2 and PW-3) categorically denied witnessing any incident, contradicting the complainant's allegations. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts