Vishambhar singh vs Bhagwat dayal — 19/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 92. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPKJ010010852023

Filing Number

51/2023

Filing Date

02-Mar-2023

Registration No

19/2023

Registration Date

02-Mar-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 92

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishambhar singh

    Adv. Sukhram kumar yadav

  2. 2.Munni Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhagwat dayal

  2. 2.Shivnarayan

  3. 3.Diwan Singh

  4. 4.Aditya Kumar

  5. 5.Raj Bahadur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Application DisposalView PDF

    Case Summary: 19/2023 Court Decision: The District Judge of Kannauj ALLOWED the petition filed by Vishambhar Singh and Munni Devi under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code to file a suit regarding the management of a public religious trust (the Radhakrishna/Ramchandra Temple trust in village Karmullapur). The court found the allegations of mismanagement, personal use of trust property, lack of proper accounts, and unauthorized disposal of trust assets to fall within the scope of Section 92. Key Reasoning: The court held that the petitioners' claims regarding breach of trust principles, unauthorized personal use of trust property, destruction of temple lands and gardens, and non-maintenance of accounts fell within provisions (a), (b), and (d) of Section 92 CPC, which permit court intervention in trust management disputes. The court rejected the respondent's argument that current trustees appointed in 2008 cannot be challenged without proper inquiry into trust administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 07-May-2026

    For orders

    District & Session Judge

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Restored

    District & Session Judge

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  12. 31-Jan-2025

    Application DisposalView PDF

  13. 31-Jan-2025

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  14. 17-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  15. 09-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  16. 23-Dec-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  17. 12-Dec-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  18. 25-Oct-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  19. 24-Sep-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  20. 17-Aug-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  21. 16-Jul-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  22. 18-May-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  23. 03-May-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  24. 18-Apr-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  25. 05-Mar-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  26. 25-Jan-2024

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  27. 21-Dec-2023

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  28. 24-Nov-2023

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  29. 27-Oct-2023

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  30. 26-Sep-2023

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  31. 22-Aug-2023

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  32. 12-Jul-2023

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  33. 18-May-2023

    Awaiting services of notices/summons

    District & Session Judge

  34. 06-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 02-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 19/2023 Court Decision: The District Judge of Kannauj ALLOWED the petition filed by Vishambhar Singh and Munni Devi under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code to file a suit regarding the management of a public religious trust (the Radhakrishna/Ramchandra Temple trust in village Karmullapur). The court found the allegations of mismanagement, personal use of trust property, lack of proper accounts, and unauthorized disposal of trust assets to fall within the scope of Section 92. Key Reasoning: The court held that the petitioners' claims regarding breach of trust principles, unauthorized personal use of trust property, destruction of temple lands and gardens, and non-maintenance of accounts fell within provisions (a), (b), and (d) of Section 92 CPC, which permit court intervention in trust management disputes. The court rejected the respondent's argument that current trustees appointed in 2008 cannot be challenged without proper inquiry into trust administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case