State vs Geeta Devi — 298/2024

Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 19th March 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: UPKJ010010032024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-02-2024

Filing Number

956/2024

Filing Date

12-02-2024

Registration No

298/2024

Registration Date

15-02-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

783

Police Station

ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY ACT,2003 Section 138(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

State

Respondent(s)

Geeta Devi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

19-03-2026

Disposed

07-02-2026

For Evidence

05-12-2025

For Evidence

04-10-2025

For Evidence

07-08-2025

For Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Judgement Pronounced

The court acquitted Geeta Devi of charges under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act 2003 for alleged electricity theft, finding insufficient evidence to prove the accusations. The judge determined that prosecution witnesses provided contradictory testimony, lacked credible documentation (disconnection slip lacked proper signatures and dates), and failed to present necessary technical evidence like electricity meter inspection reports. Additionally, the accused had already paid all outstanding dues and penalties as of March 6, 2026, and the electricity department raised no objections to case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted Geeta Devi of charges under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act 2003 for alleged electricity theft, finding insufficient evidence to prove the accusations. The judge determined that prosecution witnesses provided contradictory testimony, lacked credible documentation (disconnection slip lacked proper signatures and dates), and failed to present necessary technical evidence like electricity meter inspection reports. Additionally, the accused had already paid all outstanding dues and penalties as of March 6, 2026, and the electricity department raised no objections to case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case