Bitola vs State — 356/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,395. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010008732026

Filing Number

808/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

356/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,395

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bitola

    Adv. Sarvesh Kumar Yadav

  2. 2.rubi

  3. 3.ravita

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Bail petition is allowedView PDF

    Case Summary: 356/2026 The court conditionally granted bail to the three accused women (Bitola, Ruby, and Ravita) charged under IPC Sections 323 and 395 (voluntarily causing hurt and dacoity). The court found that no medical examination report was filed regarding assault allegations, the accused had no prior criminal records, and no case of misuse of interim bail was established. The court approved the bail petition subject to each accused furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to appear before the court as required and not to tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 356/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 356/2026 The court conditionally granted bail to the three accused women (Bitola, Ruby, and Ravita) charged under IPC Sections 323 and 395 (voluntarily causing hurt and dacoity). The court found that no medical examination report was filed regarding assault allegations, the accused had no prior criminal records, and no case of misuse of interim bail was established. The court approved the bail petition subject to each accused furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to appear before the court as required and not to tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case