Ramavtar vs State — 338/2026

Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010007762026

Filing Number

714/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

231

Police Station

GURSAHAIGANJ

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramavtar

    Adv. Rajesh Kumar Kanaujia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail petition is allowedView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court at Kannauj granted bail to Ram Autar, accused under Section 138(1)(B) of the Indian Electricity Act for electricity theft, after finding that all outstanding dues to the electricity department had been paid. The court accepted the bail petition with a condition that the accused furnish a bond of Rs. 25,000 and an equal personal surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court at Kannauj granted bail to Ram Autar, accused under Section 138(1)(B) of the Indian Electricity Act for electricity theft, after finding that all outstanding dues to the electricity department had been paid. The court accepted the bail petition with a condition that the accused furnish a bond of Rs. 25,000 and an equal personal surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case