State vs Harpal — 308/2024

Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: UPKJ010007172024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-02-2024

Filing Number

696/2024

Filing Date

02-02-2024

Registration No

308/2024

Registration Date

15-02-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

552

Police Station

ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY ACT,2003 Section 138(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

State

Respondent(s)

Harpal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Appearance of accused

07-02-2026

Appearance of accused

02-02-2026

Appearance of accused

11-11-2025

Appearance of accused

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Judgement Pronounced

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Electricity Act) at Kannauj acquitted accused Harpal under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding electricity dues to the department. The court found that electricity theft offenses under Section 135/138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act are compoundable (capable of settlement), and since the accused fully discharged his financial obligations to the electricity board, the offense was extinguished and he was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Electricity Act) at Kannauj acquitted accused Harpal under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding electricity dues to the department. The court found that electricity theft offenses under Section 135/138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act are compoundable (capable of settlement), and since the accused fully discharged his financial obligations to the electricity board, the offense was extinguished and he was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case