State vs Harpal — 308/2024
Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 138(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPKJ010007172024
e-Filing Number
02-02-2024
Filing Number
696/2024
Filing Date
02-Feb-2024
Registration No
308/2024
Registration Date
15-Feb-2024
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
552
Police Station
ANTI POWER THEFT THANA KANNAUJ
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Harpal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Judgement PronouncedView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Electricity Act) at Kannauj acquitted accused Harpal under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding electricity dues to the department. The court found that electricity theft offenses under Section 135/138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act are compoundable (capable of settlement), and since the accused fully discharged his financial obligations to the electricity board, the offense was extinguished and he was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
07-Feb-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
02-Feb-2026
Appearance of accused
ADJ I
-
11-Nov-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
26-Sep-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj F.t.c.ii
-
28-Jul-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj V
-
26-May-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
24-Mar-2025
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
23-Dec-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
21-Sep-2024
Appearance of accused
Adj III
-
27-Jun-2024
Hearing
Adj III
-
04-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 308/2024
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Electricity Act) at Kannauj acquitted accused Harpal under Section 152(3) of the Electricity Act 2003, after he paid all outstanding electricity dues to the department. The court found that electricity theft offenses under Section 135/138(1)(b) of the Electricity Act are compoundable (capable of settlement), and since the accused fully discharged his financial obligations to the electricity board, the offense was extinguished and he was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts