Priyanka vs State — 329/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,115(2),352,121(2),132,351(2). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010006902026

Filing Number

632/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

329/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

CHHIBRAMAU

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,115(2),352,121(2),132,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Priyanka

    Adv. Rishi kumar dubey

  2. 2.Reena

  3. 3.Anjali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail petition is allowedView PDF

    Case 329/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Kannauj, granted bail to the three accused women (Priyanka, Reena, and Anjali) charged under BNS sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, 121(2), 132, and 351(3) in a case arising from a Holi celebration brawl. The court found that while a factual dispute existed between two village groups, the prosecution failed to establish specific and credible evidence proving the accused's individual culpability or intent to cause life-threatening injuries. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 329/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Kannauj, granted bail to the three accused women (Priyanka, Reena, and Anjali) charged under BNS sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, 121(2), 132, and 351(3) in a case arising from a Holi celebration brawl. The court found that while a factual dispute existed between two village groups, the prosecution failed to establish specific and credible evidence proving the accused's individual culpability or intent to cause life-threatening injuries. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case