Himanshu vs Vinish Kumar — 79/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPKJ010006602026

Filing Number

605/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Himanshu

    Adv. Satish chandra Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinish Kumar

  2. 2.Vipin Yadav

  3. 3.Rohit yadav

  4. 4.Lakhan singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Application DisposalView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNS, finding that the petition was filed due to resentment stemming from a pending civil dispute over land rather than genuine criminal allegations. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's account (claiming theft of a motor without mentioning physical assault) and concluded the petition lacked credibility, therefore rejecting the request to lodge an FIR against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNS, finding that the petition was filed due to resentment stemming from a pending civil dispute over land rather than genuine criminal allegations. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's account (claiming theft of a motor without mentioning physical assault) and concluded the petition lacked credibility, therefore rejecting the request to lodge an FIR against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case