Anvar vs State — 321/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),109(1),352,351(3),131,115(2),190. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 10th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010006542026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

601/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

321/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

666

Police Station

CHHIBRAMAU

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),109(1),352,351(3),131,115(2),190
ARMS ACT Section 3/25/27

Petitioner(s)

Anvar

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Application Disposal

Summary The Sessions Court in Kannauj rejected the bail application of Anver in Criminal Case No. 666/2025 involving serious charges including criminal intimidation, voluntary causing hurt with firearms, and criminal intimidation under BNS and Arms Act. The court found that the accused is named in a violent incident where the victim suffered a gunshot wound, an illegal firearm was recovered on the accused's disclosure, and investigation is ongoing; consequently, the court determined insufficient grounds for bail release, citing the serious nature of the crime and risk of evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court in Kannauj rejected the bail application of Anver in Criminal Case No. 666/2025 involving serious charges including criminal intimidation, voluntary causing hurt with firearms, and criminal intimidation under BNS and Arms Act. The court found that the accused is named in a violent incident where the victim suffered a gunshot wound, an illegal firearm was recovered on the accused's disclosure, and investigation is ongoing; consequently, the court determined insufficient grounds for bail release, citing the serious nature of the crime and risk of evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case