Palli Koda Abraham Kantilal vs State — 316/2026

Case under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 3, 5(1). Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010006512026

Filing Number

598/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

461

Police Station

THATHIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 3, 5(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Palli Koda Abraham Kantilal

    Adv. Aftab Ali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is rejectedView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Kannauj granted bail to the accused Palli Koda Abraham Kantilal in a case under Section 3/5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Anti-Religious Conversion Act 2021. The court found that while the accused was named in the FIR, there was no direct and independent evidence of his involvement at that stage, no criminal history on record, and he was in judicial custody with investigation ongoing. The court released him on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Kannauj granted bail to the accused Palli Koda Abraham Kantilal in a case under Section 3/5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Anti-Religious Conversion Act 2021. The court found that while the accused was named in the FIR, there was no direct and independent evidence of his involvement at that stage, no criminal history on record, and he was in judicial custody with investigation ongoing. The court released him on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case