Faiyaz Ahmad vs State — 311/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 61(2),191(2),191(3),109(1),352,351(3),131,115(2),190. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPKJ010006342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
583/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
311/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
666
Police Station
CHHIBRAMAU
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Faiyaz Ahmad
Adv. Amit Mishra
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Kannauj granted anticipatory bail to Faiyaz Ahmad in Criminal Case No. 666/2025 under charges including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation with weapon (IPC Sections 109, 191, 351, 352, 131, 190, 115 BNS and CLA Act Section 7). The court found credible evidence (CCTV footage and medical records) supporting the applicant's claim that he was receiving dental treatment 40 km away in Farrukhabad at the time of the alleged incident (6:20 PM on 29.11.2025), making his presence at the crime scene physically impossible. The court approved the bail application with conditions including a personal bond of ₹2 lakh and restrictions on leaving the country without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Kannauj granted anticipatory bail to Faiyaz Ahmad in Criminal Case No. 666/2025 under charges including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation with weapon (IPC Sections 109, 191, 351, 352, 131, 190, 115 BNS and CLA Act Section 7). The court found credible evidence (CCTV footage and medical records) supporting the applicant's claim that he was receiving dental treatment 40 km away in Farrukhabad at the time of the alleged incident (6:20 PM on 29.11.2025), making his presence at the crime scene physically impossible. The court approved the bail application with conditions including a personal bond of ₹2 lakh and restrictions on leaving the country without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts