Raman vs State — 312/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),111(2),61(2). Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 17th April 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010006312026

Case disposed

Filing Number

580/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

312/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

INDERGARH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),111(2),61(2)
Information Technology Act Section 66D

Petitioner(s)

Raman

Adv. ramesh chandra pandey

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

17-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Hearing

10-04-2026

Hearing

06-04-2026

Hearing

30-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Bail Petition is rejected

Case 312/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kannauj dismissed Raman's interim bail petition under Section 482 CrPC dated 17.04.2026. Key Facts & Reasoning: Raman was accused of cybercrime fraud involving multiple bank accounts across Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Telangana, Bihar, and Tamil Nadu totaling approximately ₹8,51,000. He and six co-accused allegedly operated a fake manpower recruitment website (deluxeinternationalmanpower.com), defrauding victims by promising foreign visas through WhatsApp and other messaging platforms, siphoning money into various bank accounts including one in his name (A/C 110264885234). Investigation revealed WhatsApp communications and IPDR records linking him to the conspiracy. The court found credible evidence of organized cybercrime under IPC Sections 318(4), 111(2), 61(2) and IT Act Section 66D, rejecting his claim of false implication and finding substantial grounds for prosecution to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 312/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kannauj dismissed Raman's interim bail petition under Section 482 CrPC dated 17.04.2026. Key Facts & Reasoning: Raman was accused of cybercrime fraud involving multiple bank accounts across Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Telangana, Bihar, and Tamil Nadu totaling approximately ₹8,51,000. He and six co-accused allegedly operated a fake manpower recruitment website (deluxeinternationalmanpower.com), defrauding victims by promising foreign visas through WhatsApp and other messaging platforms, siphoning money into various bank accounts including one in his name (A/C 110264885234). Investigation revealed WhatsApp communications and IPDR records linking him to the conspiracy. The court found credible evidence of organized cybercrime under IPC Sections 318(4), 111(2), 61(2) and IT Act Section 66D, rejecting his claim of false implication and finding substantial grounds for prosecution to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case