Gendan Lal vs Kripal Singh — 69/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 02nd May 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPKJ010006092026
Filing Number
563/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
69/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Special Judge SC/St Act
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gendan Lal
Adv. Inamul Haque Hasmi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kripal Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
Application DisposalView PDF
Case Summary: 69/2026 - Gendan Lal v. Kripal Singh The court registered a complaint under Section 173(4) BNS based on petitioner Gendan Lal's petition alleging that on 17.02.2026, respondents Kripal Singh, Ashok Kumar, Jagat Singh and Nanhi Devi trespassed his agricultural field, destroyed his crop, assaulted him with lathis using caste-based slurs, threatened his life, and stole ₹1,000. The court found no police FIR was registered despite a complaint to the police superintendent. Relying on precedent, the court converted the petition into a formal complaint under BNS rather than requiring police investigation, holding the facts and circumstances warranted direct judicial proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/St Act
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2026
Case Summary: 69/2026 - Gendan Lal v. Kripal Singh The court registered a complaint under Section 173(4) BNS based on petitioner Gendan Lal's petition alleging that on 17.02.2026, respondents Kripal Singh, Ashok Kumar, Jagat Singh and Nanhi Devi trespassed his agricultural field, destroyed his crop, assaulted him with lathis using caste-based slurs, threatened his life, and stole ₹1,000. The court found no police FIR was registered despite a complaint to the police superintendent. Relying on precedent, the court converted the petition into a formal complaint under BNS rather than requiring police investigation, holding the facts and circumstances warranted direct judicial proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts