Pankaj alias Chandrakant vs State — 293/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),118(2),351(2),352,333. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010005932026

Filing Number

549/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

293/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

THATHIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),118(2),351(2),352,333

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pankaj alias Chandrakant

    Adv. Jagdish Chandra Dwivedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

  2. 2.Neeraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is rejectedView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Pankaj alias Chandrakant under IPC sections 115(2), 118(2), 351(2), 352, and 333. The court found that the petitioner and respondent Neeraj had a heated altercation on 18.02.2026, during which both parties engaged in violent conduct, causing injury to one another, and the allegations against the petitioner were substantiated by the first information report and police investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 293/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Pankaj alias Chandrakant under IPC sections 115(2), 118(2), 351(2), 352, and 333. The court found that the petitioner and respondent Neeraj had a heated altercation on 18.02.2026, during which both parties engaged in violent conduct, causing injury to one another, and the allegations against the petitioner were substantiated by the first information report and police investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case