Upendra vs State — 268/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 09th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPKJ010005422026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

502/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

268/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

TALGRAM

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

Upendra

Adv. Shwetank Arun

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

18-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Bail Petition is rejected

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Kannauj rejected the bail application of Upendra (accused in dowry death case Crime No. 50/2025 under BNS sections 80(2), 85 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4). The court found that the accused is charged with demanding additional dowry (₹1 lakh and a motorcycle) from his wife and subjecting her to physical and mental harassment, leading to her death by hanging in February 2025 within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances. Given the serious nature of the offense, the postmortem findings confirming asphyxiation due to hanging, the accused's status as the deceased's husband and primary accused, and that co-accused already obtained bail, the court determined bail was not warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Kannauj rejected the bail application of Upendra (accused in dowry death case Crime No. 50/2025 under BNS sections 80(2), 85 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4). The court found that the accused is charged with demanding additional dowry (₹1 lakh and a motorcycle) from his wife and subjecting her to physical and mental harassment, leading to her death by hanging in February 2025 within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances. Given the serious nature of the offense, the postmortem findings confirming asphyxiation due to hanging, the accused's status as the deceased's husband and primary accused, and that co-accused already obtained bail, the court determined bail was not warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case