Upendra vs State — 268/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPKJ010005422026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
502/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
268/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
TALGRAM
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Upendra
Adv. Shwetank Arun
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Kannauj rejected the bail application of Upendra (accused in dowry death case Crime No. 50/2025 under BNS sections 80(2), 85 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4). The court found that the accused is charged with demanding additional dowry (₹1 lakh and a motorcycle) from his wife and subjecting her to physical and mental harassment, leading to her death by hanging in February 2025 within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances. Given the serious nature of the offense, the postmortem findings confirming asphyxiation due to hanging, the accused's status as the deceased's husband and primary accused, and that co-accused already obtained bail, the court determined bail was not warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Kannauj rejected the bail application of Upendra (accused in dowry death case Crime No. 50/2025 under BNS sections 80(2), 85 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4). The court found that the accused is charged with demanding additional dowry (₹1 lakh and a motorcycle) from his wife and subjecting her to physical and mental harassment, leading to her death by hanging in February 2025 within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances. Given the serious nature of the offense, the postmortem findings confirming asphyxiation due to hanging, the accused's status as the deceased's husband and primary accused, and that co-accused already obtained bail, the court determined bail was not warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts