Suresh chandra vs State — 33/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPKJ010005392026

Filing Number

499/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

GURSAHAIGANJ

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh chandra

    Adv. Ram ashre Srivastva

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

  2. 2.Branch Manage Shiv Singh

  3. 3.Prashantu Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgement PronouncedView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 33/2026 Suresh Chandra vs. State & Ors. The Sessions Judge dismissed Suresh Chandra's revision against the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order converting his Section 173(4) BNSS application into a complaint case. Chandra alleged that State Bank officials misappropriated over Rs. 2 lakh from his savings account through unauthorized transfers, while the bank claimed his son withdrew the funds. The court held that the magistrate's decision to convert the application into a complaint (rather than reject it or direct police investigation) was within judicial competence, and that rival contentions require full trial proceedings where the bank must prove its claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 33/2026 Suresh Chandra vs. State & Ors. The Sessions Judge dismissed Suresh Chandra's revision against the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order converting his Section 173(4) BNSS application into a complaint case. Chandra alleged that State Bank officials misappropriated over Rs. 2 lakh from his savings account through unauthorized transfers, while the bank claimed his son withdrew the funds. The court held that the magistrate's decision to convert the application into a complaint (rather than reject it or direct police investigation) was within judicial competence, and that rival contentions require full trial proceedings where the bank must prove its claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case